Comparing Security: OANDA vs. ADSS

When it comes to online trading, security is one of the most critical factors traders must consider before choosing a broker. Two well-known names in the industry — OANDA and ADSS — are often compared for their credibility, regulatory oversight, and client protection mechanisms. In this article, we examine how secure these two brokers are and what traders can expect from their safety features.

 Regulatory Oversight

OANDA is one of the most regulated brokers globally. It operates under multiple financial authorities, including:

•        CFTC (U.S.) and NFA: In the United States, OANDA is registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and is a member of the National Futures Association (NFA), two of the strictest regulators in the world.

•        FCA (UK): In the UK, OANDA is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, a respected financial watchdog known for its high compliance standards.

•        ASIC (Australia) and IIROC (Canada): OANDA also complies with regulatory authorities in Australia and Canada, making it a globally trusted name.

In comparison, ADSS (Abu Dhabi-based) is a regional powerhouse in the Middle East and is:

•        Regulated by the Securities and Commodities Authority (SCA) of the UAE, which requires capital adequacy and client fund segregation.

•        Additionally, ADSS is licensed by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK, giving it international recognition and added credibility.

While OANDA has a broader global regulatory presence, ADSS provides strong localized compliance in the GCC region along with UK-level protection.

 Client Fund Protection

OANDA protects client funds through the following:

•        Segregated Client Accounts: OANDA keeps client funds separate from its operating capital, ensuring they cannot be used for company expenses or debts.

•        No Negative Balance Protection (US): In the U.S., negative balance protection is not mandated, and OANDA does not offer it there. However, in jurisdictions like the EU, it complies with local rules that protect clients from going below zero balance.

ADSS offers:

•        Full Segregation of Client Funds: ADSS is committed to ensuring all retail client funds are fully segregated from its company accounts.

•        Negative Balance Protection: ADSS applies negative balance protection to retail clients, ensuring that traders never lose more than their deposit — a particularly important feature for volatile markets.

Here, ADSS may hold an edge for newer traders or those looking for stronger account protection by default.

 Platform Security and Data Encryption

Both brokers utilize bank-grade encryption and data protection:

•        OANDA uses 256-bit SSL encryption on its platforms and websites to protect user data and transactions. The broker also conducts frequent penetration testing to ensure platform integrity.

•        ADSS also uses high-level encryption and secure socket layer (SSL) technology. Its internal systems are monitored for unusual activity, and clients’ trading environments are protected by strict firewall protocols.

From a cybersecurity perspective, both brokers are on par with modern security standards used by major financial institutions.

 Internal Audits and Risk Management

OANDA, with its presence in countries like the U.S., Canada, and Japan, is subject to frequent audits by regulators. This includes maintaining minimum capital requirements, complying with financial reporting rules, and having robust risk management systems.

ADSS, though smaller in global scale, adheres to regular financial reporting under SCA and FCA standards. The company provides full transparency regarding its financial health and also undergoes independent audits to maintain compliance.

OANDA’s broader international obligations may indicate a more layered risk management structure, while ADSS's localized audits ensure strong compliance within its operating regions.

 Final Thoughts: Which Is More Secure?

Both OANDA and ADSS are highly secure brokers, offering strong regulatory backing, client fund protection, and data security measures. However, their strength lies in different areas:

• OANDA is ideal for traders looking for a broker with global regulatory recognition and long-term trust in North American and European markets.

• ADSS may appeal more to traders based in the Middle East or those who prioritize negative balance protection and strong local support.

Ultimately, choosing between them depends on where you reside and what level of risk protection you value most. Both brokers meet international safety standards and offer a reliable trading environment.

If you're looking for a secure way to trade in global markets — including gold, forex, and cryptocurrencies — with peace of mind, consider trying a system like SMARTT. This AI-powered trading robot operates only through regulated brokers like FBS, AvaTrade, and Exness, ensuring your capital is always protected under global compliance standards.